no way. we may not do 20 demos a day but the effort is still worth it. any time anyone puts it in. lately it's just been difficult to find balance between getting good reviewers and refusing those not capable of doing objective reviews. we had several volunteers, but they are the so-called "french school" of demo reviewing - thinking that one timer in 20 minutes is enough for a ban. and very often a timer that can be easily explained naturally or that simply does not exist and the situation was stretched to fit the "I want to ban this guy" agenda.

things may go slow sometimes but they still work. I'd rather work slow and thorough than fast and banning players for things they didn't do. we had several demos stalled because after several f1 votes, people posted a few f2. it happens, it's part of the process where people have to decide what is and isn't hack.
_________________